Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Welcome to the Institute of Linguistics! On this website you can find all the important information about the institute.
Best student presentation of MMSYM 2024 is from Frankfurt
Employee and doctoral student Alina Gregori as well as Vera Wolfrum (Uni Würzburg) win the award for the best student presentation at this year’s MMSYM.
Best student presentation of Speech-Prosody 2024 is from Frankfurt
Employee and doctoral student Anna Preßler wins the award for the best student presentation at this year’s Speech-Prosody Conference.
Orientation event for BA Linguistics
The orientation event for first-semester students in the BA Linguistics program will take place on October 14, 2024 from 3 p.m. in room IG 454.
Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm Prizes for International German Studies awarded to Ermenegildo Bidese
Ermenegildo Bidese (University of Trento) completed his habilitation in the Department of Modern Philology in Frankfurt in 2021. In 2024 he received the Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm Prizes for International German Studies from the DAAD.
Summer schools Linguistics 2024
There are two relevant summer schools for students:
End of Seminars = Start of Term Papers
With the conclusion of the lecture period, the work on the term papers begins. We kindly request all students writing term papers or theses in linguistics to follow our guidelines.
We celebrate Katharina Hartmann’s 60th birthday
During the birthday workshop “Syntax in Focus – A workshop in honour of Katharina Hartmann’s 60th birthday” we presented the festschrift in honour of Katharina on January 12, 2024: “To the left, to the right, and much in between“. It can be downloaded for free as an e-book (PDF) here.
We congratulate the Institute of Linguistics on the newly approved special research area NegLaB
From April 2024, the new DFG special research area “Negation in Language and Beyond” (SFB 1629 NegLaB) will start at Goethe University. The Institute of Linguistics is significantly involved in numerous projects at the SFB.
MA student Farbod Eslami Khouzani receives this year’s DAAD Prize
The MA linguistics student Farbod Eslami Khouzani (picture, middle) received this year’s DAAD Prize for international students on October 5th, 2023. His outstanding academic achievements as well as his social commitment were recognized. We congratulate him! More information
Prof. Katharina Hartmann and Prof. Frank Kügler nominated for the best doctoral supervision
The Goethe Research Academy for Early Career Researchers (GRADE) awards a prize every year for the best doctoral supervision. This year, two of the professors from linguistics have been nominated: Prof. Frank Kügler and Prof. Katharina Hartmann. More information
Apply now for the BA Linguistics until August 31, 2023
You can find information and links under: Freshmen/Beginners
The Department of Linguistics at Goethe University Frankfurt offers in collaboration with the Department of English and American Studies, the Department of Psycholinguistics and the Teaching of German, and the Department of Romance Literatures and Languages two linguistic programs, a BA Linguistik taught in German and an MA Linguistics taught in English. In addition, the Department takes part in the BA Germanistik and in the Teacher Education Program.
|
The Institute of Linguistics, which is based in the Faculty of Modern Languages (FB 10), has special expertise in the fields of language structure (syntax and phonology), semantics and pragmatics, psycholinguistics (language acquisition, language processing), and historical linguistics, and represents known researchers. In addition, there are close contacts and cooperation with the linguists in the Institutes of English and Romance Studies, with philosophy (Faculty of Philosophy and History, FB 08), and the Institute for Empirical Linguistics (Faculty ofLinguistics and Cultural Studies, FB 09).
Besides the Institute of Linguistics, there is also research and teaching in linguistics in other institutes. More details can be found here:
The potential of the Frankfurt linguistics is especially in the realm of foundational research in linguistics. The active research is bundled in various projects.
The following professorships belong to the Department of Linguistics:
In teaching, the following professorships are affiliated to the Institute of Linguistics:
We are happy to announce a talk by Alla Paslawska (Lwiw) in the Semantics Colloquium.
The talk will take place on campus in IG 4.301.
If you wish to participate virtually via Zoom, please contact Lennart Fritzsche for the link.
The talk will be held in German.
Date: December 5, 2024
Time: 4 pm – 6 pm c.t.
Title: Wie viele Gesichter hat die Negation?
Abstract:
Jede der Wissenschaft bekannte Sprache verfügt über morphologische Mittel, die Negation zum Ausdruck bringen können. Dazu werden Partikeln, Affixe, Konjunktionen etc. zugerechnet. Bedeutet das, dass die Negation eine morphologische Kategorie ist? Bei näherem Hinsehen merkt man, dass im Fall der Negation die Morphologie uns oft im Stich lässt. Denn was bedeutet eigentlich niemand? Man denkt wohl nicht an Odysseus, der unter dem Namen „Niemand“ dem Polyphem einen glühenden Pfahl in das einzige Auge gerammt hat. Niemand bedeutet vielmehr jemand, nichts ist etwas etc., d.h. die Antwort nach dem kategorialen Status der Negation ist im Bereich der Semantik zu finden. Trotzdem haben auch die Syntax, Prosodie und Pragmatik über die Negation viel zu sagen. Der typologisch ausgerichtete Vortrag geht auf unterschiedliche Bereiche der sprachlichen Negation ein und begründet ein mehrdimensionales Modell der Negation.
We are happy to announce a talk by Paul Koenig (Frankfurt) in the Semantics Colloquium.
The talk will take place on campus in IG 4.301.
If you wish to participate virtually via Zoom, please contact Lennart Fritzsche for the link.
Date: October 28, 2024
Time: 4 pm – 6 pm c.t.
Title: Scale theory in adjective semantics
Abstract:
Gradable adjectives cause difficulties in the analysis of their semantic and logical form due to different phenomena such as references to comparative classes, dimensional references, units of measurement, factor phrases and norm references. How the constants of the semantic form relevant for graduation are represented in the logical form, taking into account the factors mentioned, is part of the work of Bierwisch (1987), on which the approaches in this paper are based. The main objective is to use a new definition of directed intervals to specify the definitions given in Bierwisch 1987, which are intended to provide a mathematical/logical framework for the representation of the logical form, and to close problems that arise and gaps in the underlying scale theory. Directional intervals are an extension of the classic interval with a directional component. The idea is that an interval differs in whether the direction is specified, for example, from 5 to 10 or from 10 to 5. This distinguishes [5;10] from [10;5], whereby both directed intervals still contain the set of all real numbers between 5 and 10 (inclusive). With these intervals and the new definitions of e.g. combination and multiplication of directed intervals, some definitions relevant for graduation, which were only vaguely specified by Bierwisch (1987), can be made more precise. In addition, antonym pairs and sentences with units of measurement can be better represented using directed intervals.
We are happy to announce a single-authored talk by Sebastian Walter (Frankfurt) and a talk by him and Lennart Fritzsche (Frankfurt) in the Semantics Colloquium.
The talk will take place on campus in IG 4.301.
If you wish to participate virtually via Zoom, please contact Lennart Fritzsche for the link.
Date: November 21, 2024
Time: 4 pm – 6 pm c.t.
Title:
Indirect discourse as mixed quotation: Insights from shifted face emoji
(joint work with Stefan Hinterwimmer)
Abstract:
Indirect discourse (ID) has been claimed to prohibit shifted interpretations of face emoji (Grosz et al. 2023). However, in this talk evidence is presented that face emoji can receive a shifted interpretation in ID utterances. Specifically, it will be shown that they can receive an interpretation from the perspective of the matrix subject, thus adding ID to the list of environments where the interpretation of face emoji is not strongly anchored to the author (cf. Grosz et al., 2021). A similar behavior has been attested for certain deictic expressions (Plank, 1986; Anderson, 2019) as well as self-pointing gestures (Ebert & Hinterwimmer, 2022; Walter, 2024). Drawing on a suggestion by Ebert & Hinterwimmer (2022), these findings are interpreted as evidence of mixed quotation being available in ID. Building on an earlier analysis extending Davidson’s (2015) demonstrational account of quotation to ID (Walter, to appear), we claim that ID—roughly speaking—makes two meaning contributions: i) an at-issue contribution that there exists a reported speech event, its content being the same as the proposition embedded under the attitude verb in the ID utterance and ii) a not-at-issue contribution that the demonstration of this speech event made by the ID utterance is similar to the form of a subevent of the reported speech event, thereby enforcing that only parts of the reported speech event are quoted.
Title:
Nodding yes or doch? On the interpretation of gestural response elements
Abstract:
In response to negative antecedents, German ja (‘yes’) and nein (‘no’) can be used interchangeably. Both can be used to affirm negative antecedents, but never to reject them. A rejection of negative antecedents is only felicitous with the specialized particle doch, cf. (1).
(1)
A: Sind meine Schuhe nicht in deinem Kleiderschrank? (‘Are my shoes not in your closet?’)
B: (i) Ja. (= They aren’t.)
(ii) Nein. (= They aren’t.)
(iii) Doch. (= They are.)
It has been standardly assumed that–in cases such as responding to polar questions–, standalone (pro-speech) headnods and headshakes can be used interchangeably with ‘yes’ and ‘no’, respectively (e.g., Kendon, 2002; Fusaro et al., 2012; Lücking and Ginzburg, 2021).
As it stands, however, there is only a vague empirical picture of the distribution of standalone head gestures used as response elements. While it is fairly easy to identify nodding with ‘yes’ and shaking with ‘no’ in positive contexts, the situation is more complex in negative contexts (e.g., Loos and Repp, 2024, for German).
We present data from an experimental forced-choice study investigating the interpretation of headnods and headshakes used as response elements in comparison to German ja and nein. Our findings suggest that while both headnods and headshakes can be used to affirm negative antecedents (just like ja and nein), headnods, by themselves, can also be used to reject negative antecedents, akin to doch. Thus, a more complete picture of German response tokens in negative contexts incorporates the interchangeability of ja, nein and headshake, while headnods are at least to some extent ambiguous.
We are happy to announce a talk by Alexandrine Dunlap (GU/Florida) in the Syntax Colloquium.
The talks will take place in person. Room IG 4.301
Date: November 18, 2024
Time: 4 pm – 6 pm ct
Title: “Operator Agreement in Sentential Negation”
Abstract:
In this talk I will put forward possible analyses that can account for Gweno’s unique agreeing negation. In Gweno main clause sentential negation, a post-verbal negation particle is inflected for the phi features of the subject. Additionally, Gweno uses an alternate negation strategy for certain clause types, specifically relative clauses and conditionals which encode negation with a post-initial prefix. Given the strict relationship between the negation particle and subject inflection on the verb, I explore the possibility of movement of the entire TP into the specifier of NegP and the role an operator may play in facilitating this pattern.
We are happy to announce a talk by Samuel O. Acheampong and Anke Himmelreich (GU) in the Syntax Colloquium.
The talks will take place in person. Room IG 4.301
Date: November 11, 2024
Time: 4 pm – 6 pm ct
Title: “On the interaction between coordination and focus marking: The case of Mabia languages”
Abstract:
In this talk we present data from two Mabia languages, Likpakpaanl and Dagbani, that show that the marker for clausal coordination is identical to the ex-situ focus marker. Further, in a clausal coordination construction, focus marking is impossible in the second conjunct. We discuss the idea that the focus construction and the clausal coordination construction are structurally identical in the sense that the marker links two elements of different syntactic categories and we show how this can derive the empirical observations about clausal coordination in the Mabia languages.